I buy most of my shirts from Woot.com, and most recently acquired this one:
It brings me a joy that defies all description.
And come to think, Christine wasn’t going to let me have it! Indeed, she tries to foil numerous of my crusades to acquire new and exciting treasures for the house. Recently amongst them, my plaster Roman pillar from the craft store (“But you don’t understand, I need this!”), my red dragon pillow-pet, stout as a loaf of bread and with his customary and impenetrable red scales all over him (also from the craft store), my bacon wallet made of duct tape, and a small but stately army of stuffed critters, in order of rank: a beaver, a moose, and an ewok.
She says our place is plenty cluttered enough, especially for someone advertising himself as a minimalist. I informed her of her ignorance, and said she doesn’t get it: I am a fitness minimalist, that is all I claim to be, and the the purpose of life, my little rabbit, I said—the sole and singular reason for our existence—naturally, is to acquire in excess an abundance of things we don’t need, says the Bible.
It’s very easy to acquire things. In fact, I even acquired a St. Bernard while still in college, and regularly I explained to my landlord, no Sir, like I’ve told you before, that’s not a St. Bernard, that’s my sister, Bridget. And not too soon after did I acquire another St. Bernard, Chewie, and somebody once told me I’m the only person he ever knew that just up and buys St. Bernards wantonly, and I told him he should be happy to know me, and he was.
Like I said, it’s very easy to acquire things, but very difficult to get rid of them. My life, it seems, is a landing strip in a rainstorm, permitting arrival, but preventing departure. Things come in, but they never go back out, unless Christine trashes them behind my back, that snake. I once caught her throwing away something of mine very treasured—my plastic turkey, which routinely guards the bookshelf. I opened the trash lid, to throw away some paper towels, and there he was, waddle side up, staring me straight in the face—son of a bitch. I took him out at once and delivered to Christine a reprimanding, and oh, I was SO mad—Don’t you EVER touch him, EVER(!), I said, because you’ll NEVER understand, and then I threw my shoe at the window and broke a chair with my foot.
Exercise programs work much the same way, they so easily collect clutter; sort of like a check valve—they let things in, but not back out; and so we do things we don’t need to do, shouldn’t be doing.
Now I often say any exercise program will improve in direct ratio to the number of things you can keep out of it that shouldn’t be there, and I mean it, because the secret to a good exercise program, my friends, is simplicity—to strip it down to its fewest, most fundamental components, and then leave it at that.
I am a minimalist, at least, a fitness minimalist, and I think an exercise program should contain no unnecessary workouts, a workout no unnecessary exercises. So this begs the question, just how little exercise can you get away with, and still be successful? Really and truly, I don’t know, but it’s significantly less than what most folks are doing, I’m sure of that.
I just had a baby, and what’s cool, is he was actually really easy to make, and she—Christine (my girlfriend)—showed me all about how to do it, and after some vicious threats, I became willing, but all I could think was oh goodness this is so terribly, terribly wrong, but by His graces I went to confession and had all sins absolved. Now I go to confession four to five times a week, once I even went nineteen times, after some oysters, and broke the highest score on record, for a Tuesday.
His name is Roan, and when he’s all swaddled up he looks like a little ear of corn, so I call him The Corncobbler and pretend his special power is getting stuck in people’s teeth. Now what he’s taught me is how little the human organism needs to survive, but if only a handsome pair of boobies. So to thrive, I think, how can it require all that much more? My answer, of course, would be not much.
He’s also taught me that anything good is spoiled in excess. One progeny is contentment enough. But ten progeny, all at once, and I imagine my life would be but the sum of ten teensy weensy crapholes, and far less decent than it is now.
So here is my philosophy on fitness and life: Do the least amount you need to do to get the job done, and not a smidgen more. Instead of a million different exercises, how about just two or three useful ones?
Simplify: The Secret to a Good Exercise Program
Minimalism, applied directly to fitness, it might look something like this:
Frequent, low rep, high-quality strength work + Less frequent, high-intensity metabolic conditioning + As much joint mobility and low-intensity cardiovascular activity as possible.
Strength train 5 days a week, frequently, low-rep, constant load. Here’s what I mean: pick a couple of lifts—actually, use my friend Dan John’s fundamental human movement blueprint: push, pull, hinge, squat, loaded carry.
Example:
Military Press (push)
Pull Up (pull)
Swing (hinge)
Goblet Squat (squat)
Get Up (loaded carry).
Work each lift, each day, and in the manner of 1,2,3,1,2,3 (ladder format). Because the frequency is high, the volume is low, and so is the density, too. The intensity, in my book, should not be waved—meaning, start your cycle with a “heavy” load, say, your 5 rep max, work that for three months, in the manner just mentioned, or until it starts to feel “light.” Then, reassess, bump the weight up to what is hopefully your new 5 rep max, and repeat the operation.
In effect, the load has been waved by not waving it at all—no calculating percentages, none of that hooey. You just get strong instead, which, to me, is far more appealing than having to deal with the inconvenience of math. This is strength training in the extremest simplicity.
Two to three days a week, perhaps a bit less or a bit more, depending upon your sport, recovery, and other such etceteras, add in some high-intensity metabolic work. I like sprints and kettlebell complexes, because they are simple, and metabolics should be simple.
This is where, if I might veer slightly off course, Crossfit is caked in error, many layers thick. They like to insert complicated lifts into what should otherwise be a very simple endeavor. Instead of using something sensible for metabolics, they use Olympic lifting, and with no show of reason for it. This is a mistake. Olympic lifting does not hold up well under fatigue—it’s too technical. It should be used for power, for low reps, and not for breaking a sweat.
This is why there is Crossfit and then there is common sense—you can’t have one without losing something of the other. Now I know a good number of people are going to be hurt by that, but let me just say, that really and truly, and from the very bottom of my heart, I don’t care.
It needn’t be complicated. It shouldn’t be complicated! Don’t make into an hour what can be done in thirty minutes. And certainly don’t take thirty minutes, if you can get away with fifteen.
Simplicity, Simplicity, Simplicity! Every time I enter the gym I hear these words, ringing in my head, as if shouted by Thoreau himself, and with all the alarm of a fire bell.
And don’t forget about brisk walking. I take two every day, and this is where I’ve yet to find any upper threshold. The more the better, a curious effect, and one that seems nearly exclusive to brisk walking.
I usually walk my two St. Bernards, Dingus 1 and Dingus 2, respectively, on down to Kimberton Whole Foods, to buy the makings for some juice, and if Christine comes along, then we have rounded out the Dinguses and are roughly a parade. People slow down as they drive by, just to get a good look; because walking a St. Bernard is not like walking any other kind dog. It’s like riding a sputtering moped, and you make a spectacle of yourself every time. They jar you forward at every sniffable occasion, and with no caution of the surroundings. One time, Lola nearly tossed me off a precipice, and was so happy about it, that I nearly tossed her off the precipice.
But all this juicing of carrots and beets, I just don’t know, the contents of my toilet bowl are starting look like a Pink Floyd concert.
Recommended Resources
I have some resources to help you out. And yes, I’m about to recommend some products and services, so you can skip this section if you’d like, but I’m not going to do any high-pressure sales-pitching or anything like that. I’m just going to say hey, I think I have a few things that can really help you out, and if you’d like to know a little bit more about them, cool, if not, no big deal.
The first is my Inner Circle. This is a monthly newsletter devoted to fitness minimalism. I provide exercise programs, nutrition protocols, and all other things of the sort that I think my readers will find helpful. The Inner Circle is very personal, very “me to you”, and so it contains a good deal of zaniness. As well, the Inner Circle allows you to work closely with me on your health and fitness goals, through private email correspondence. CLICK HERE to learn more.
The second is The 9-Minute Workout. This is the best workout I’ve ever made, especially for those in a time-crunch. It requires only one kettlebell, and is fairly heinous. You can get it HERE.
Thirdly, is private online coaching. But this is only for those who are very serious about working very closely with me on achieving their goals. This requires a minimum three month commitment, and is fairly expensive, so to be fair, it’s not for everyone.
The easiest way to describe it is like this: My Inner Circle is like a good bath robe—it feels good, and will fit just about anyone. The programs, nutrition protocols, and advice contained within are designed to work very well, broadly—and they do, if you commit yourself to them.
Private online coaching is like custom, tight-fitting pants. The programs and nutrition protocols are tailored just for you, and will fit ONLY you. This is for those who want custom, tight-fitting pants. If that sounds like you, then CLICK HERE to learn more.
Venturing a Strength Workout Idea
I want to leave you with an action item. This in response to a common question, most recently asked by my reader Mike, inquiring as to “what are the best strength-building kettlebell exercises”.
Well, here’s is what I think…
Less is More T-Shirts Now Available For Sale in Limited Quantity!
Nothing windy here, just want to let you know we finally got more t-shirts in, and that if you want one, well, come and get it!
These sold out EXTREMELY FAST last time we put them up, so, if interested, please get your order in immediately.
FAST ACTION BONUS: Order your t-shirt, take a picture in it, email that picture to PatFlynn@ChroniclesOfStrength.com, and I will give you any one of our eBooks, for free. That includes The Birth of a Hero, The 9-Minute Workout, or any one of the Inner Circle newsletters.
But the deadline to order your shirt and be eligible for the bonus this is Thursday, Oct 17th.
Scott says
Pat what so you classify the muscle up under for the big 5 ?
Pat Flynn says
Hey Scott, good question. Really, it is two distinct movements, and most of the time, should be classified as such–both a pull and a push. But I would not see much harm coming from filing it under a pull, and still having military press as a push.
scott says
thank you pat for the reply, My other question is the ladder format for the loaded carries? how do you apply reps to say farmers walk? Or if you choose the get up does it end up being 3 straight gets ups Left then 3 straight get ups Right for your top rung?
thanks
Tim says
Pat, I go to a gym that has both free weights and kettlebells. What kind of routine would you suggest that incorporates both?
Pat Flynn says
Hey Tim, same as above, but now you can incorporate some of the barbell lifts.
For example, your push could be bench press, your hinge the deadlift, your squat the back squat, etc.
But here’s one I really like:
Push: Military Press
Pull: Pull Up (Weighted)
Hinge: Deadlift
Squat Front Squat (Barbell or Kettlebell)
Carry: TGU
Hope this helps.
Tim says
Very helpful Pat thanks for always answering!
STU says
Pat, so are you saying Mon-Pushday, Tue-Pullday, Wed-Hingday, Thur-Squatday, and Fri-Caryday, or all five everyday?
Thanks for being the voice of simplicity when I get distracted by the newest workout hype!
Pat Flynn says
Hey STU, all five everyday my friend.
Captain Crossfit says
Great article Pat. I’ve simplified things where in the gym, I do squats, deadlifts, bench press and pullups. Twice a week. Other two days, kettlebells. Military Press, Rows, Lunges and Snatches. Day off in between each workout for recovery. Switch the program every 4 weeks, doing ladders next.
Pat Flynn says
Thank you, and it sounds like you’ve got a good handle on things. Curious, why “Captain Crossfit”, if not a Crossfitter?
Captain Crossfit says
The name is because when I think of Crossfit, I don’t think of the garbage they do. Crossfit to me means getting your lifting and cardio in at the same time. What turned me on to kettlebells was that you were killing 2 birds with one stone (lifting and jogging like I used to do) This me thumbing my knows at the pseudo crossfit community. Call it being contrarian
Clark says
Hi Pat,
Are we doing two 3 rung ladders per exercise or are we going for as many quality sets as possible within a certain amount of time?
Also, what weight would you recommend for the 10,000 swing challenge?
Thanks,
Clark
Pat Flynn says
Hello Clark,
For the program, two 3-rung ladders, but for the workout (which you might wish to use in another program), a density set of as many high-quality 3-rung ladders as you can get in fifteen minutes. A subtle variation.
Orlando Sanchez says
Hey Pat,
First congrats on the new addition Roan. I wish you many sleep filled nights ( actually you can kiss those goodbye for a while HA!) Just wanted to say thanks on the information you have been sharing. I have been pairing down my training for some time now and the minimalist approach is excellent.
I do a variation of the same type of exercises groups every day (push, pull hinge squat carry) and its given me great results. Currently I’m sidelined because for some reason I thought running 10 miles was a good idea 2 weeks back-my body, specifically my right foot disagreed very strongly. I’ll be up and around soon. In the meantime I’ll read your posts.
What are your thoughts on body weight exercises?
Pat Flynn says
Hello Orlando,
The minimalist approach IS excellent! And sorry to hear about your injury–take the time to heal up proper.
I love bodyweight exercises, I have many programs featured in my Inner Circle using just bodyweight exercises. Next month, I will have even more.
Using one arm push up for a push, is just one great example–or the pistol squat for the squat.
That right there, “the naked warrior” approach, of just pistol squats and one arm push ups, is a damn effective strength routine in its own right.
dennis says
Pat,
On your suggested 1-2-3 would you also add in swings & complexes for conditioning? or KWOW? Could you also add in higher reps of each on alternate days without diminishing benefit keeping it minimal.
Would doing the timed version getting in more reps of each one on different days be the same as doing 2x 1-2-3 each day be comparable? I would think so if there were 10 sets in the timed version. One getting more worked less often verses less sets more often.
Pat Flynn says
Hello Dennis, yes, a few days a week, you could run a few complexes for metabolic work. You could add in higher reps, but you will be getting that from the metabolic work mostly–especially if you are doing the complexes, so it would be largely unnecessary.
The latter example is just a workout idea–for anyone who is simply following the KWOWs–and not a part of the full program above, and not to be done everyday–the density/volume is simply too high. I can see how this might cause confusion–but the reason the reps and volume are so low with the program above, is because the frequency is high; it’s spread out, thinly, over five days. This works, because you get just the right amount of practice everyday.
Hope this helps. Let me know if you need further clarification.
michael says
Hi Pat
Thanks for the great resource. Very refreshing in the sea of fluff that is the internet..
My question is what are your thoughts on the Olympic lifts? Are they worth learning? I would have thought they would complement the kettlebell complex training that you advocate. My clients and I are loving the simplified strength and conditioning approach. The Olympic lifts are very fashionable right now but they do seem to have merit. Im hard in training for SFG level 1 cert with Pavel next month in South Africa and have an opportunity to do a cert in the lifts in December that is recognized by the IWF but am unsure.
Pat Flynn says
Hello Michael,
Yes, I do think the Olympic lifts are worth learning–under a very qualified coach, that is. But they should not be used for metabolics, like my complexes are. Different tool for a different purpose. The olympic lifts would actually be best fitted in the above strength program -1,2,3,1,2,3-once you get a good handle on them.
Lindsey says
will you ever have shirts for women? I can’t wear big baggy t-shirts. even size small is huge on me and I’m not some teeny tiny little girl. or is the program as a whole geared towards men? that would explain the exclusively men’s sized shirts.
Pat Flynn says
Lindsey, you are mistaken. Our shirts are unisex American Apparel. And what would T-Shirt sizes have to do with who my programs are geared towards. You’ve arrived at a false and inconsistent conclusion.
Alex says
Pat,
Finally truth about CrossFit.
Completely agree about simplicity and push-pull idea.
Travis says
Hey Pat,
Can I expect to gain size as well as strength?
Shawn says
Pat, great article as usual. 2 questions:
If one’s main goal is fat loss should he do the metabolic conditioning in the above workout more than twice per week?
In a more recent post you spoke of doing 300 swings per day for fat loss. Would you recommend these in addition to the above workout?
Thanks!
Pat Flynn says
No Shawn, if fat loss is your goal, stick to the program outlined and really dial in the nutrition. Adding in more metcon is simply not necessary in most cases. In most cases, the problem is nutrition. And yes, you could add in the 300 swings to this. Keep strong!
NikoH says
Hey Pat,
This looks like a really good program, I started this yesterday.
I just have a question about the rest times. I’m doing this with a barbell lifts: front squat 70kg, bench 85kg, chinups bw, deadlift 120kg; starting with 5rm.
I have 30-45 minutes of time to train everyday, so how long should the rest periods be between sets? From one minute to two or from 3 to 5 min? If it’s the latter its going to be long workouts.
Thank you.
Pat Flynn says
Rest “as much as you need but as little as you have to” between sets to go into the next feeling fresh and confident
Brian Baggetta says
Pat — really like the look of this workout. Like you around this time, I have a new addition around the house, and less time than I used to have. Just two questions: (1) are the getups done as ladders up to three rungs as well? I have always thought the getup was better as a single, but would be willing to re-think that; and (2) would the swings be done as ladders, or separately in larger quantities?